Endovascular carotid revascularization under open-chest extracorporeal circulation combined with cardiac surgery in unstable patients at increased risk of carotid-related stroke: SIMultaneous urgent cardiac surgery and MicroNet-covered stent carotid revascularization in extreme-risk patients-SIMGUARD Study.

BACKGROUND: In patients at urgent need for cardiac surgery coexisting with increased-stroke-risk carotid stenosis, any staged intervention increases the risk of complications from the primarily unaddressed pathology. In this challenging cohort, we assessed safety and feasibility of endovascular carotid revascularization under open-chest extracorporeal circulation (ECC) combined with cardiac surgery (hybrid-room true simultaneous treatment). METHODS: Per-protocol (PP), after general anesthesia induction, chest-opening and ECC stand-by installation, carotid stenting (CAS) was performed (femoral/radial or direct carotid access) with ad-hoc/on-hand switch to ECC cardiac surgery. RESULTS: Over 78 months, 60 patients (70.7±6.9years, 85% male, all American Society of Anesthesiology grade IV) were enrolled. All were at increased carotid-related stroke risk (ipsilateral recent stroke/transient ischemick attack, asymptomatic cerebral infarct, increased-risk lesion morphology, bilateral severe stenosis). Majority of study procedures involved CAS+coronary bypass surgery or CAS+valve replacement±coronary bypass. 45 (75%) patients were PP- and 15 (25%) not-PP (NPP-) managed (context therapy). CAS was 100% neuroprotected (transient flow reversal-64.4%, filters-35.6%) and employed micronet-covered plaque-sequestrating stents with routine post-dilatation optimization/embedding. 4 deaths (6.7%) and 7 strokes (11.7%) occurred by 30-days. Despite CAS+surgery performed on aspirin and unfractionated heparin-only (delayed clopidogrel-loading), no thrombosis occurred in the stented arteries, and 30-days stent patency was 100%. NPP-management significantly increased the risk of death/ipsilateral stroke (OR 38.5; P<0.001) and death/any stroke (OR 12.3; P=0.002) by 30-days. CONCLUSIONS: In cardiac unstable patients at increased carotid-related stroke risk who require urgent cardiac surgery, simultaneous cardiac surgery and CAS with micronet-covered stent lesion sequestration is feasible and safe and shows efficacy in minimizing stroke risk. Larger-scale, multicentric evaluation is warranted. (SIMGUARD NCT04973579).

Combined intra-arterial and intra-muscular transfer of Wharton's jelly mesenchymal stem/stromal cells in no-option critical limb ischemia - CIRCULATE N-O CLI Pilot Study.

Introduction: Despite progress in pharmacologic and revascularization therapies, no-option critical limb ischemia poses a major clinical and societal problem. Prior cell-based strategies involved mainly autologous (limited) cell sources. Aim: To evaluate the safety and feasibility of a novel ischemic tissue reparation/regeneration strategy using Wharton's jelly mesenchymal stem/stromal cells (WJMSCs) as an "unlimited" cell source in N-O CLI (first-in-man study, FIM). Material and methods: Enrollment criteria included Rutherford-4 to Rutherford-6 in absence of anatomic/technical feasibility for revascularization and adequate inflow via the common femoral artery with patency of at least one below-the-knee artery. 30 × 106 WJMSCs were administered intra-arterially and intra-muscularly (50%/50%) over 3-6-week intervals (3-6 administrations). Safety, feasibility and potential signals of efficacy were assessed at 12 and 48 months. Results: Five patients (age 61-71, 60% male, Rutherford-6 20%, Rutherford-5 60%, Rutherford-4 20%) were enrolled. WJMSCs were administered per protocol in absence of administration technique-related adverse events. Hyperemia, lasting 12-24 h, occurred in 4/5 subjects. Transient edema and pain (reactive to paracetamol) occurred in 3 (60%) patients. Amputation-free survival was 80% after 12 and 48 months. In those who avoided amputation, ischemic ulcerations healed and Rutherford stage improved. 4/5 patients were free of resting pain after 3-6 doses. Conclusions: This FIM study demonstrated the safety and feasibility of WJMSCs use in patients with N-O CLI and suggested treatment efficacy with ≥ 3 doses. Our findings provide a basis for a randomized, double-blind clinical trial to assess the efficacy of WJMSC-based therapeutic strategy in N-O CLI patients.

Cellular therapies in no-option critical limb ischemia: present status and future directions.

Critical limb ischemia - an advanced stage of lower extremity arterial disease with presence of rest pain and/or ischemic ulcers - remains an important cause of major amputations and disability in developed societies. Novel treatment strategies are urgently needed to prevent (or delay) amputations in particular for patients in whom effective revascularization is no longer feasible for anatomic and/or technical reasons (no-option critical limb ischemia - N-O CLI). Cellular therapies have been gaining the growing attention of researchers and clinicians in the last two decades. Several cell types have been used in pre-clinical and clinical studies, and a number of mechanisms have been proposed to contribute to vascular reparation and regeneration in N-O CLI. Although early trials suggested clinical improvement with use of cell-based therapies in N-O CLI, meta-analyses that included randomized controlled trials have not provided definitive conclusions. Fundamental limitations have involved poorly defined cell lines/populations, limited numbers of study participants and limited follow-up periods, and enrolling patients "too sick to benefit" (such as those in Rutherford class 6). Recent advances include standardized "unlimited" sources of therapeutic cells and better understanding of mechanisms that may contribute to vascular reparation and regeneration. Furthermore, based on recent pre-clinical and clinical studies, cell-free preparations (such as microvesicle-based) are being increasingly developed along with advanced therapy medical products consisting of engineered cells and pro-angiogenic factors.

Safety helmets for skiers and snowboarders--efficacy, safety and fitting principles. Review of literature.

Head trauma is leading cause of mortality after injuries related with skiing and snowboarding. Wearing a helmet is considered to be a primary method to prevent traumatic brain injuries (TBI) among alpine sports participants. This article, based on literature review, determines the efficacy of helmets and safety of their use. It also presents practical principles of proper helmet fitting. A well proven reduction in the risk of TBI connected with helmet use is reported in the literature, ranging from 22 to 60%. Helmet use does not increase the risk of neck and C-spine injury. There is no good evidence to support the claim that use of helmets increases the risk compensation behaviors among participants. Proper fit includes adequate size, non-attenuated peripheral vision and hearing, well adjusted retention system (chinstrap). This factors may influence both efficacy and safety of helmet use. Helmets are recommended for all skiers and snowboarders.